Effectiveness of non-surgical interventions for patients with chronic sciatica: A systematic review with network meta-analysis.
Zhaochen Zhu, Tim Schouten, Rob Strijkers, Bart Koes, Heike Gerger, Alessandro Chiarotto
The journal of pain May 13, 2025 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105431 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA systematic review and network meta-analysis of 50 randomized controlled trials involving 4920 adults with chronic sciatica found very uncertain evidence regarding the effectiveness of non-surgical interventions. At short-term follow-up, spinal manipulative therapy, exercise combined with neural mobilization, and soft tissue anesthetic injections showed the largest reductions in leg pain intensity compared to placebo, but all were based on very low confidence evidence. Epidural magnesium injections improved physical function at short-term, and long-term improvements in physical function were seen with epidural steroid plus ketamine injections and epidural injections combined with physical therapy, again with very low confidence. No high-quality evidence confirms the superior effectiveness of any non-surgical intervention for chronic sciatica.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Systematic review and network meta-analysis Randomized Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 4,920 |
| Population | Adults aged 18 or older with chronic sciatica lasting 3 months or longer |
| Interventions | spinal manipulative therapy exercise + neural mobilization soft tissue anesthetic injections epidural magnesium injections epidural steroid + ketamine injections epidural injections + physical therapy |
| Keywords | Non-surgical intervention Chronic pain Spine health Sciatica treatment Non-surgical therapy |
| Citations | 1 |
| Key finding | The evidence is very uncertain regarding the effectiveness of any non-surgical intervention for chronic sciatica, with no high-quality evidence confirming superior effectiveness. |
Abstract
The objective of the study was to investigate the comparative effectiveness of non-surgical interventions for adults with chronic sciatica. EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched until 7th June 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of non-surgical interventions in adults (aged 18 or older) with chronic sciatica (3 months or longer). Primary outcomes were leg pain intensity and physical function at short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up. Two reviewers independently conducted the screening process, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment (with the Cochrane risk of bias 2.0 tool). Frequentist random effects network meta-analysis was conducted, and evidence confidence was evaluated with the CINEMA method. Fifty RCTs (4920 participants) were included. At short-term, spinal manipulative therapy (mean difference [MD] - 61.01, 95 % CI - 94.64 to - 27.39), exercise + neural mobilization (MD - 60.01, - 93.08 to - 26.95), and soft tissue anesthetic injections (MD - 60.01, - 99.08 to - 20.95) showed the largest reductions in leg pain intensity versus placebo (all based on very low confidence evidence). Epidural magnesium injections improved physical function at short-term (MD - 40.45, - 54.00 to - 26.89; very low confidence). Long-term reductions in physical function occurred with epidural steroid + ketamine injections (MD -15.51, - 21.50 to - 9.52) and epidural injections + physical therapy (MD - 12.01, - 17.27 to - 6.75; very low confidence). In summary, the evidence is very uncertain regarding the effectiveness of non-surgical interventions in patients with chronic sciatica. Future RCTs should minimize bias and include larger sample sizes to improve the confidence on the evidence base for chronic sciatica. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42022361572). PERSPECTIVE: Currently, no high-quality evidence confirms the superior effectiveness of any non-surgical intervention for patients with chronic sciatica. While some treatments may provide short-term leg pain relief, the very low confidence of the evidence highlights the need for rigorous and large-scale trials to better guide clinical decision-making.