Unique effects of sedatives, dissociatives, psychedelics, stimulants, and cannabinoids on episodic memory: A review and reanalysis of acute drug effects on recollection, familiarity, and metamemory.

Psychoactive drugs produce unique subjective states, but their effects on episodic memory often overlap. This reanalysis of 10 data sets (28 drug conditions) used signal detection models to separate three memory processes: recollection (retrieving specific details), familiarity (recognizing without details), and metamemory (introspecting about memory accuracy). Sedatives impaired both recollection and familiarity during encoding but enhanced recollection during consolidation. Dissociatives and cannabinoids impaired recollection during encoding, and cannabinoids increased false recollections during retrieval. Psychedelics impaired recollection during encoding but tended to enhance familiarity. Stimulants enhanced metamemory during encoding and retrieval but impaired metamemory during consolidation. These distinct patterns help explain drug-specific phenomena like sedative-induced blackouts and psychedelic presque vu, and suggest that memory quantity and stability influence metamemory.

Study at a glance

Abstract

Despite distinct classes of psychoactive drugs producing putatively unique states of consciousness, there is surprising overlap in terms of their effects on episodic memory and cognition more generally. Episodic memory is supported by multiple subprocesses that have been mostly overlooked in psychopharmacology and could differentiate drug classes. Here, we reanalyzed episodic memory confidence ratings from 10 previously published data sets (28 drug conditions total) using signal detection models to estimate two conscious states involved in episodic memory and one consciously controlled metacognitive process of memory: autonoetic retrieval of specific details (recollection), noetic recognition absent of retrieved details (familiarity), and retrospective introspection of memory decisions (metamemory). Sedatives, dissociatives, psychedelics, stimulants, and cannabinoids had unique patterns of effects on these mnemonic processes dependent on whether they impacted encoding, consolidation, or retrieval (the formation, stabilization, and access to memory traces, respectively). Sedatives at encoding reliably impaired both recollection and familiarity but at consolidation enhanced recollection. Dissociatives and cannabinoids at encoding impaired recollection but less reliably impaired familiarity, and cannabinoids at retrieval increased false recollections. These drug-induced encoding impairments occasionally came with metamemory enhancements, perhaps because of less interstimulus interference. Psychedelics at encoding impaired recollection but tended to enhance familiarity and did not impact metamemory. Stimulants at encoding enhanced metamemory, at consolidation impaired metamemory, and at retrieval enhanced familiarity and metamemory. These findings allude to mechanisms underlying the idiosyncratic phenomena of drugs, such as blackouts from sedatives and presque vu from psychedelics. Finally, these findings converge on a model in which memory quantity and stability influence metamemory. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).