The spiritual core of the hard problem: consciousness as foundational, not emergent.
Frontiers in psychology January 1, 2025 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1659944 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractConsciousness is not a product of the brain but the foundational reality from which mind and matter arise, according to this theoretical paper. Integrating non-dual spiritual traditions such as Advaita Vedanta and Tibetan Buddhism with contemplative science and transpersonal theory, the work argues that a consciousness-centered metaphysics offers a more coherent model for explaining subjectivity, intentionality, and qualia. It critiques materialist reductionism and the limitations of third-person methodologies, emphasizing first-person and participatory ways of knowing. The paper explores the epistemological, ethical, cultural, and ecological implications of adopting a transpersonal cosmology that bridges science and spirituality without collapsing their distinctions, inviting a pluralistic, integrative paradigm for understanding reality.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Advaita vedanta Consciousness is primary Contemplative science Cosmology and consciousness Participatory knowing |
| Key finding | Consciousness is ontologically primary, not emergent from neural processes, and a consciousness-centered metaphysics offers a more coherent model for explaining subjectivity, intentionality, and qualia. |
Abstract
This paper proposes a transpersonal reframing of the Hard Problem of Consciousness by positing that consciousness is ontologically primary-not an emergent property of neural processes, but the foundational reality from which mind and matter arise. Integrating insights from non-dual spiritual traditions such as Advaita Vedanta and Tibetan Buddhism, contemplative science, and the work of transpersonal theorists including Jorge Ferrer, Ken Wilber, and Stanislav Grof, the study argues that a consciousness-centered metaphysics offers a more coherent model for explaining subjectivity, intentionality, and qualia. In critiquing materialist reductionism, it highlights the limitations of third-person methodologies and emphasizes the legitimacy of first-person and participatory ways of knowing. The paper also explores the broader epistemological, ethical, cultural, and ecological implications of adopting a transpersonal cosmology-one that bridges science and spirituality without collapsing their distinctions. By shifting the ontological center from matter to consciousness, this framework invites a pluralistic, integrative paradigm for understanding reality, advancing both human flourishing and scientific inquiry.