Skip to content

The spiritual core of the hard problem: consciousness as foundational, not emergent.

Amira Arora

Frontiers in psychology January 1, 2025 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1659944 via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Consciousness is not a product of the brain but the foundational reality from which mind and matter arise, according to this theoretical paper. Integrating non-dual spiritual traditions such as Advaita Vedanta and Tibetan Buddhism with contemplative science and transpersonal theory, the work argues that a consciousness-centered metaphysics offers a more coherent model for explaining subjectivity, intentionality, and qualia. It critiques materialist reductionism and the limitations of third-person methodologies, emphasizing first-person and participatory ways of knowing. The paper explores the epistemological, ethical, cultural, and ecological implications of adopting a transpersonal cosmology that bridges science and spirituality without collapsing their distinctions, inviting a pluralistic, integrative paradigm for understanding reality.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Advaita vedanta Consciousness is primary Contemplative science Cosmology and consciousness Participatory knowing
Key finding Consciousness is ontologically primary, not emergent from neural processes, and a consciousness-centered metaphysics offers a more coherent model for explaining subjectivity, intentionality, and qualia.

Abstract

This paper proposes a transpersonal reframing of the Hard Problem of Consciousness by positing that consciousness is ontologically primary-not an emergent property of neural processes, but the foundational reality from which mind and matter arise. Integrating insights from non-dual spiritual traditions such as Advaita Vedanta and Tibetan Buddhism, contemplative science, and the work of transpersonal theorists including Jorge Ferrer, Ken Wilber, and Stanislav Grof, the study argues that a consciousness-centered metaphysics offers a more coherent model for explaining subjectivity, intentionality, and qualia. In critiquing materialist reductionism, it highlights the limitations of third-person methodologies and emphasizes the legitimacy of first-person and participatory ways of knowing. The paper also explores the broader epistemological, ethical, cultural, and ecological implications of adopting a transpersonal cosmology-one that bridges science and spirituality without collapsing their distinctions. By shifting the ontological center from matter to consciousness, this framework invites a pluralistic, integrative paradigm for understanding reality, advancing both human flourishing and scientific inquiry.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment