Negative affective bias in depression following treatment with psilocybin or escitalopram – a secondary analysis from a randomized trial
Bruna Giribaldi Cunha, David Nutt, Marieke Martens, David Erritzøe, Robin Carhart‐Harris, Catherine J. Harmer
Translational Psychiatry November 13, 2025 DOI: 10.1038/s41398-025-03693-w via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractIn a double-blind randomized trial, patients with long-standing moderate-to-severe depression received either two doses of 25 mg psilocybin plus daily placebo or two doses of 1 mg psilocybin plus daily escitalopram over six weeks. Both treatments comparably reduced negative bias in recognizing facial emotions, a measure of emotional information processing. However, changes in this bias were not linked to concurrent depression score changes. Only in the escitalopram group did a decrease in misclassifying positive faces as negative correlate with lower depression scores at a one-month follow-up. The findings suggest overlapping cognitive mechanisms between psilocybin and escitalopram, notable given psilocybin's short dosing regimen.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Randomized controlled trial Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 59 |
| Population | Patients with long-standing moderate-to-severe depression |
| Interventions | Psilocybin Escitalopram |
| Dose | 25 mg, 1 mg |
| Duration | 6-week intervention, 1-month follow-up |
| Topics | Depression Psilocybin |
| Keywords | Escitalopram Depression economics Placebo Randomized controlled trial |
| Key finding | Both psilocybin and escitalopram reduced negative affective bias in facial emotion recognition to a comparable level, but only escitalopram showed a longitudinal association between reduced misclassification of positive faces and lower depression scores at follow-up. |
Abstract
Abstract Recent clinical trial data suggests that ratings on depression scales are lowered after psilocybin therapy compared to placebo, though it is unclear what neuropsychological mechanisms underpin these effects. This study compared psilocybin, with an established antidepressant, escitalopram, to investigate whether there are shared or distinct effects on emotional information processing. Patients with long-standing moderate-to-severe depression were randomly and double-blindly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 1) two doses of 25 mg of psilocybin, 3-weeks apart, plus 6-weeks of daily placebo (psilocybin group N = 30); or 2) two doses of 1 mg of psilocybin 3-weeks apart plus 6-weeks of daily oral escitalopram (escitalopram group N = 29); all patients received the same psychological support. Behavioural measures of affective bias as well as subjective measures of depression were collected at baseline and at the primary 6-week endpoint, using an established computerised task (Facial Emotion Recognition Task) and Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, respectively. Change in affective bias was further correlated with change in depression scores measured concurrently as well as at 1-month post-trial follow-up (week-10), corrected for baseline depression severity. Negative bias in facial expression recognition decreased after both treatments to a comparable level. Concurrently, change in negative affective bias was not associated with change in depression. Longitudinally, a decrease in the misclassification of positive faces as negative was associated with a decrease in depression scores at week-10 for the escitalopram group only. Therefore, a more positive behavioural bias in emotional processing was seen following psilocybin and citalopram compared to baseline. This highlights the potential for at least some overlap in cognitive mechanisms across two distinct treatments, which is noteworthy given the short dosing regimen with psilocybin.