Of maps and grids.
Matteo Grasso, Andrew M Haun, Giulio Tononi
Neuroscience of consciousness January 1, 2021 DOI: 10.1093/nc/niab022 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA grid-like neural network representing posterior cortical areas can perform the same fixation function as a map-like pretectal circuit, but only the grid-like network's cause-effect structure, as analyzed by Integrated Information Theory, accounts for the subjective experience of space as extended. Standard functional analysis explains what the model does—encoding, decoding, and triggering eye movements—but cannot explain why a human fixating a stimulus would also see it at a location. The map-like network, lacking lateral connections, is functionally equivalent yet cannot account for the phenomenal properties of space.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Contents of consciousness Functionalism Integrated information theory Space |
| Citations | 20 |
| Key finding | A grid-like network's cause-effect structure, but not a functionally equivalent map-like network, can account for the subjective extendedness of experienced space. |
Abstract
Neuroscience has made remarkable advances in accounting for how the brain performs its various functions. Consciousness, too, is usually approached in functional terms: the goal is to understand how the brain represents information, accesses that information, and acts on it. While useful for prediction, this functional, information-processing approach leaves out the subjective structure of experience: it does not account for how experience feels. Here, we consider a simple model of how a "grid-like" network meant to resemble posterior cortical areas can represent spatial information and act on it to perform a simple "fixation" function. Using standard neuroscience tools, we show how the model represents topographically the retinal position of a stimulus and triggers eye muscles to fixate or follow it. Encoding, decoding, and tuning functions of model units illustrate the working of the model in a way that fully explains what the model does. However, these functional properties have nothing to say about the fact that a human fixating a stimulus would also "see" it-experience it at a location in space. Using the tools of Integrated Information Theory, we then show how the subjective properties of experienced space-its extendedness-can be accounted for in objective, neuroscientific terms by the "cause-effect structure" specified by the grid-like cortical area. By contrast, a "map-like" network without lateral connections, meant to resemble a pretectal circuit, is functionally equivalent to the grid-like system with respect to representation, action, and fixation but cannot account for the phenomenal properties of space.