Changes in State Mindfulness are the Key to Success in Mindfulness Interventions: Ecological Momentary Assessments of Predictors, Mediators, and Outcomes in a Four-Week Koru Mindfulness Intervention.
Grazia Mirabito, Paul Verhaeghen
Psychological reports November 16, 2023 DOI: 10.1177/00332941231216899 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA four-week randomized controlled mindfulness intervention with college students (55 in the intervention group, 57 in the control group; mean age 21.4) found that improvements in daily state mindfulness predicted reductions in intrusive thinking, which in turn predicted lower depression and higher well-being. The intervention improved day-to-day mindfulness, cognitive interference, and sleep, but did not significantly affect physical activity, depression, or well-being. The beneficial effects of state mindfulness were observable over a lag of four days, supporting the idea that mindfulness is a key ingredient in mindfulness interventions. Physical activity, sleep, and practice quality did not mediate any effects. Maintaining high levels of mindfulness may directly benefit mental health.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Randomized controlled trial Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 112 |
| Population | College students |
| Intervention | Koru mindfulness program |
| Duration | 4-week intervention |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Ecological momentary assessment Mental health |
| Citations | 8 |
| Key finding | Day-to-day state mindfulness predicted reductions in cognitive interference, which in turn predicted lower depression and higher well-being, with effects demonstrable over a four-day lag. |
Abstract
It is often assumed that changes in state mindfulness coupled with a decrease in intrusive thinking (e.g., rumination or worry) are the crucial ingredients in mindfulness interventions. We investigate this claim by examining within-person day-to-day changes and causal relationships among these changes in state measures of mindfulness, cognitive interference (a measure of intrusive thinking), depression, well-being, stress, sleep, physical activity, and quality of formal and informal mindfulness practice in a four-week randomized controlled mindfulness intervention with a sample of college students using the Koru mindfulness program; n = 55 for intervention, n = 57 for control; mean age = 21.4). The intervention was effective in improving day-to-day state mindfulness, cognitive interference, and sleep (the effects on all three were linear), but the effects on physical activity, depression, and well-being were not significant. Day-to-day mindfulness (the independent variable) was a predictor of change in daily cognitive interference (the mediating variable), which in turn predicted depression and well-being (dependent variables). The beneficial effects of state mindfulness were demonstrable over a lag of four days, suggesting it is indeed a key ingredient in the effectiveness of mindfulness interventions. Physical activity, sleep, and practice quality did not mediate any effects. One clear implication is that maintaining or restoring high levels of mindfulness, for instance by engaging in meditation or in more informal mindfulness exercises, would be of obvious and direct benefit to mental health and well-being.