Ontological conceptions of information cannot account for consciousness.

Epistemological conceptions of information, based on decoding extrinsic inputs to become informed, are contrasted with ontological conceptions based on intrinsic states independent of external factors. Ontological views, such as those underlying integrated information theory or panpsychism, cannot account for consciousness. In animal brains, the only known conscious systems, decoding extrinsic inputs is central to creating consciousness and its contents. Only a specific subset of decodings should realize consciousness, because it evolved to create an evaluative experience of what is intrinsically true about the world and body, used in a perception-action cycle that affords choices for behavior to accomplish goals.

Study at a glance

Abstract

Epistemological and ontological conceptions of information are contrasted. The former are based on acts of decoding of extrinsic inputs that result in a decoder becoming informed. The latter are based on intrinsic states or state changes of the system independent of any external factors such as inputs to the system. Ontological conceptions of information, such as those that underlie integrated information theory or any theory that allies itself with panpsychism, are not able to account for consciousness. In the only physical systems that are known to be conscious, namely, animal brains, acts of decoding extrinsic inputs are central to creating consciousness and its contents. Moreover, only a very specific subset of decodings should realize consciousness, because consciousness in animals evolved to create an evaluative experience of what is intrinsically true about the world and the body, which is then used in a perception-action cycle that affords choices among options for behaving in the world in order to accomplish goals.