The influence of stakeholder interests on safety outcome reporting in psychedelic research and implications for science communication.

As psychedelics gain acceptance for mental health treatment, corporate funding of clinical trials raises concerns about conflicts of interest and biased reporting. The evidence for safety and efficacy of psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy remains early. This paper examines safety concerns associated with psychedelics, how financial stakeholders may influence the reporting of safety outcomes, and why balanced science communication is critical for public health and safety during ongoing drug reform.

Study at a glance

Abstract

Psychedelics are a group of psychoactive substances that produce complex and subjective changes to consciousness and carry unique safety considerations. There is a growing body of work investigating the use of psychedelics in mental health treatment alongside increasing socio-cultural and political acceptance. This rapid evolution has prompted corporations to fund psychedelic clinical trials, leading to a potential rise in conflicts of interest in relevant studies and publications. However, the body of evidence for the safety and efficacy of psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy is early. There is concern regarding the introduction of bias in psychedelic clinical trials and the selective reporting of results amidst and beyond corporate involvement. At a crucial time in psychedelic drug reform, this paper explores the safety concerns associated with psychedelics, the potential influences of financial stakeholders on safety outcome reporting and the importance of balanced science communication in maintaining public health and safety.