Conscious experiences and high-density EEG patterns predicting subjective sleep depth.
Aurélie M Stephan, Sandro Lecci, Jacinthe Cataldi, Francesca Siclari
Current biology : CB December 20, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.10.012 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractFeeling deeply asleep may not align with actual sleep stages. In a study involving 30 participants (20 good sleepers and 10 with sleep misperception), 787 awakenings revealed that good sleepers often perceived their sleep as lightest during the first two hours of NREM sleep, typically seen as the deepest phase. In contrast, those with sleep misperception frequently felt awake and reported lighter REM sleep. High-density EEG data showed that widespread high-frequency power was inversely related to subjective sleep depth, challenging traditional views on deep sleep perception.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Observational cohort with repeated awakenings and interviews Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 30 |
| Population | Good sleepers and individuals with sleep misperception |
| Keywords | Consciousness Dream High-Density EEG Paradoxical insomnia Sleep misperception |
| Citations | 73 |
| Key finding | Subjective sleep depth is inversely related to high-frequency EEG activity, not to slow-wave sleep, and this process is abnormally active and persistent in sleep misperceptors. |
Abstract
What accounts for feeling deeply asleep? Standard sleep recordings only incompletely reflect subjective aspects of sleep and some individuals with so-called sleep misperception frequently feel awake although sleep recordings indicate clear-cut sleep. To identify the determinants of sleep perception, we performed 787 awakenings in 20 good sleepers and 10 individuals with sleep misperception and interviewed them about their subjective sleep depth while they underwent high-density EEG sleep recordings. Surprisingly, in good sleepers, sleep was subjectively lightest in the first 2 h of non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep, generally considered the deepest sleep, and deepest in rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Compared to good sleepers, sleep misperceptors felt more frequently awake during sleep and reported lighter REM sleep. At the EEG level, spatially widespread high-frequency power was inversely related to subjective sleep depth in NREM sleep in both groups and in REM sleep in misperceptors. Subjective sleep depth positively correlated with dream-like qualities of reports of mental activity. These findings challenge the widely held notion that slow wave sleep best accounts for feeling deeply asleep. Instead, they indicate that subjective sleep depth is inversely related to a neurophysiological process that predominates in early NREM sleep, becomes quiescent in REM sleep, and is reflected in high-frequency EEG activity. In sleep misperceptors, this process is more frequently active, more spatially widespread, and abnormally persists into REM sleep. These findings help identify the neuromodulatory systems involved in subjective sleep depth and are relevant for studies aiming to improve subjective sleep quality.