Skip to content

Effect of mindfulness-based interventions on anxiety, depression, and stress in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Hanani Abdul Manan, Imtiyaz Ali Mir, Syeda Humayra, Rong Yuen Tee, Deepak Thazhakkattu Vasu

Frontiers in psychology January 1, 2024 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1435243 via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

A systematic review and meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled trials involving 623 coronary artery disease patients found that mindfulness-based interventions significantly improve mental health. The interventions reduced anxiety, depression, and stress, with effect sizes ranging from moderate to large. Subgroup analyses showed no significant regional differences for anxiety or depression, but a significant effect for stress. The trials had satisfactory methodological quality overall, though all lacked allocation concealment and blinding, and some had gender imbalances and inadequate follow-up. More rigorous studies with equal gender representation and long-term follow-up are needed.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Systematic review and meta-analysis Randomized Peer reviewed
Sample size 623
Population Coronary artery disease patients
Intervention Mindfulness-based interventions
Topics Anxiety Depression
Keywords Coronary artery disease Mindfulness-based stress reduction
Citations 15
Key finding Mindfulness-based interventions significantly reduce anxiety, depression, and stress in coronary artery disease patients.

Abstract

Adopting lifestyle interventions is pivotal in coronary artery disease (CAD) management and prevention to amplify cardiovascular and mental well-being. This study aims to quantify the effect of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) on anxiety, depression and stress in CAD patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted by searching four electronic databases (PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Science Direct) through December 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the PEDro tool, and the study outcomes were expressed as standard mean difference at 95% CI. Out of 1838 yielded results, eight RCTs involving 623 participants with a mean age of 56.96 ± 4.89 met the prespecified eligibility criteria. The pooled results showed a statistically significant and beneficial effect of MBIs on CAD patients' mental health status in regards to anxiety (SMD = -0.83; 95% CI [-1.19, -0.46], p < 0.001), depression (SMD = - 0.86; 95% CI [-1.14, -0.58], p < 0.001), and stress (SMD = -0.69; 95% CI [-1.27, -0.12], p = 0.02). The subgroup sensitivity analyses based on the region (Asia vs. Europe) indicated a statistically non-significant subgroup effect of MBIs on anxiety (I 2 = 63.9%, p = 0.10) and depression (I 2 = 25.8%, p = 0.25), and a significant effect on stress (I 2 = 80.0%, p = 0.03). Although the methodological quality of the trials was generally satisfactory, all studies lacked allocation concealment and blinding. Additionally, gender imbalances, and inadequate follow-up may have potentially compromised the validity of the trials. Mindfulness-based interventions are beneficial for improving CAD patients' anxiety, depression and stress symptoms. Nevertheless, it is imperative to conduct more rigorous and robust studies with an equal gender ratio and long-term follow-up.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment