A Tale of Two Treatments: A Randomised Controlled Trial of Mindfulness or Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Delivered Online for People with Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Louise Sharpe, Madelyne A Bisby, Rachel E Menzies, Jack Benjamin Boyse, Bethany Richmond, Jemma Todd, Amy-Lee Sesel, Blake F Dear
Psychotherapy and psychosomatics January 1, 2025 DOI: 10.1159/000542489 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractFor people with rheumatoid arthritis, online mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) both reduced pain interference more than a waitlist control, with comparable improvements in depression. MBSR was better than CBT for fear of progression after treatment and for functional ability at 6-month follow-up, while CBT alone reduced pain severity at 6-month follow-up. A history of recurrent depression did not affect how well either treatment worked. The effect sizes matched those of face-to-face interventions, confirming both online treatments are effective for rheumatoid arthritis.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Randomized controlled trial Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 269 |
| Population | People with rheumatoid arthritis |
| Interventions | Mindfulness-based stress reduction Cognitive behaviour therapy |
| Duration | 6-month follow-up |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Chronic pain Cognitive behaviour therapy Pain management Rheumatoid arthritis |
| Citations | 7 |
| Key finding | MBSR and CBT were equally efficacious in reducing pain interference compared to a waitlist control, with MBSR showing superior outcomes for fear of progression and functional ability and CBT showing superiority for pain severity. |
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the relative efficacy of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) or cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) in comparison to a waitlist control (WLC) for people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Participants completed assessments before and after treatment and at 6-month follow-up. Two hundred and sixty-nine participants with RA were recruited and randomised in a 2:2:1 ratio to MBSR:CBT:WLC. Participants completed a semi-structured clinical interview for depression and were stratified for history of recurrent depression. We measured the primary outcome of pain interference, as well as pain severity, depression, anxiety, functional ability, and fear of progression. We predicted that MBSR and CBT would result in improvements compared to WLC. We also predicted that those with a history of recurrent depression would benefit more from MBSR than CBT for depression. MBSR and CBT were equally efficacious in reducing pain interference compared to WLC. Similar results were found for depression. MBSR demonstrated superior outcomes to CBT for fear of progression at post-treatment and functional ability at 6-month follow-up. CBT only was better than WLC for pain severity at 6-month follow-up. Depressive status did not moderate the efficacy of treatment. MBSR and CBT resulted in statistically and clinically significant changes in pain interference compared to WLC. MBSR was more efficacious than CBT for functional ability and fear of progression, while CBT showed superiority for pain severity. The effect sizes were comparable to those achieved with face-to-face interventions, confirming both online treatments are effective for people with RA.