Skip to content

4-Bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine (2C-B) and structurally related phenylethylamines are potent 5-HT2A receptor antagonists in Xenopus laevis oocytes.

Claudio A Villalobos, Paulina Bull, Patricio Sáez, Bruce K Cassels, J Pablo Huidobro-Toro

British journal of pharmacology April 1, 2004 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705722 via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Certain phenylethylamines (PEAs), including 2C-I, 2C-B, 2C-D, and 2C-H, block serotonin 5-HT2A receptors but not 5-HT2C receptors, showing subtype selectivity. In experiments with frog oocytes engineered to carry rat receptor clones, these compounds inhibited serotonin-induced currents at the 5-HT2A receptor, requiring a two-minute preincubation for maximum effect. The blocking potency depended on the chemical substituent at the fourth carbon position, with 2C-I being the most potent, followed by 2C-B, 2C-D, and 2C-H. The findings suggest that the psychoactive effects of these compounds may not rely solely on activating 5-HT2A receptors, as previously thought.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Experimental study Peer reviewed
Population Xenopus laevis oocytes microinjected with rat 5-HT2A or 5-HT2C receptor clones
Interventions 2C-I 2C-B 2C-D 2C-H
Topics Serotonin
Keywords Psychoactive compounds Psychoactive effects Phenylethylamines 2c-b Serotonin receptors
Citations 50
Key finding A series of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-substituted phenylethylamines blocked 5-HT2A but not 5-HT2C receptor-mediated responses in Xenopus laevis oocytes.

Abstract

1. We recently described that several 2-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-substituted phenyl)ethylamines (PEAs), including 4-I=2C-I, 4-Br=2C-B, and 4-CH(3)=2C-D analogs, are partial agonists at 5-HT(2C) receptors, and show low or even negligible intrinsic efficacy at 5-HT(2A) receptors. These results raised the proposal that these drugs may act as 5-HT(2) antagonists. 2. To test this hypothesis, Xenopus laevis oocytes were microinjected with the rat clones for 5-HT(2A) or 5-HT(2C) receptors. The above-mentioned PEAs and its 4-H analog (2C-H) blocked the 5-HT-induced currents at 5-HT(2A), but not at the 5-HT(2C) receptor, revealing 5-HT(2) receptor subtype selectivity. The 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonism required a 2-min preincubation to attain maximum inhibition. 3. All PEAs tested shifted the 5-HT concentration-response curves to the right and downward. Their potencies varied with the nature of the C(4) substituent; the relative rank order of their 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist potency was 2C-I>2C-B>2C-D>2C-H. 4. The present results demonstrate that in X. laevis oocytes, a series of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-substituted PEAs blocked the 5-HT(2A) but not the 5-HT(2C) receptor-mediated responses. As an alternative hypothesis, we suggest that the psychostimulant activity of the PEAs may not be exclusively associated with partial or full 5-HT(2A) receptor agonism.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment